Want to find out more about managing project performance, and knowing whether a project is truly on track? Project performance measures success against key objectives such as time, budget, resources and profitability. This guide covers the metrics, tools and strategies needed to monitor and improve it.
Project performance management is the process of measuring, monitoring, and improving how effectively a project is progressing towards its objectives. It gives project managers and stakeholders a clearer view of whether work is on schedule, within budget, appropriately resourced, and delivering the expected outcomes.
Rather than looking at one metric in isolation, project performance management typically considers several areas, including:
Using a project management software can help bring this information together, making project performance easier to monitor throughout the project lifecycle.
Even well-planned projects can move off track. Deadlines change, costs increase, resources become stretched, and project scope can evolve. Project performance management helps teams identify these issues early rather than discovering them once they have already affected delivery or profitability.
Effective performance management can help organisations:
Without consistent performance monitoring, problems such as overspending, missed deadlines and resource bottlenecks can remain hidden until they become more difficult and costly to resolve.
For architecture and engineering firms, project performance is closely tied to time, fees, resources and profitability. Tracking the right KPIs helps project managers see whether each project phase is progressing as planned while identifying budget pressure, resource constraints and scope changes early.
Architecture and engineering projects often move through defined phases, from concept and detailed design to documentation and delivery. Tracking milestones alongside schedule variance helps project managers identify when drawings, calculations, reviews or other deliverables are falling behind programme.
Schedule Variance (SV) = Earned Value (EV) − Planned Value (PV)
A negative schedule variance indicates that completed work is behind what was planned, giving the project manager an opportunity to adjust resources or timelines before delays affect later phases.
For A&E firms, staying within the agreed fee can be just as important as meeting the project schedule. Comparing fee burn, planned hours and actual hours shows whether the team is consuming the project budget faster than expected.
Fee Burn = Fee or Budget Used ÷ Total Project Fee or Budget × 100
For example, if a project has consumed 75% of its fee budget but is only 55% complete, the project manager can investigate which phases or disciplines are exceeding their estimates before the remaining margin is eroded.
For projects using earned value management, teams can also monitor:
Cost Performance Index (CPI) = Earned Value (EV) ÷ Actual Cost (AC)
A CPI below 1.0 indicates that the project is costing more than the value of the work completed.
Architecture and engineering projects rely on the availability of people with specific skills, from architects and structural engineers to technicians and project managers. Resource utilisation helps firms understand how effectively that capacity is being used.
Resource Utilisation = Productive or Billable Hours ÷ Available Hours × 100
Tracking planned versus actual utilisation can also reveal when an individual, discipline or project team is becoming overloaded, helping managers redistribute work and plan future project demand more effectively.
Client revisions, additional design requirements and changes to specifications can quickly increase the amount of work required on an A&E project. Tracking scope changes, rework hours, change requests and quality issues helps teams understand where unplanned work is affecting schedules and budgets.
Where additional work falls outside the agreed scope, recording it early also makes it easier to assess the impact on project fees, resources and delivery dates.
A project can meet its deadline and still underperform financially. Architecture and engineering firms should therefore monitor project margin, labour costs, billable hours and actual versus forecast profitability throughout delivery.
Project Margin = (Project Revenue − Project Costs) ÷ Project Revenue × 100
Monitoring margin as the project progresses can reveal whether extra hours, scope changes or resource costs are reducing the expected return, allowing teams to take corrective action before project close.
Milient Project Flow is a project management software built for architecture, engineering and consulting firms that need to connect project delivery with financial performance. It brings project planning, time and budget tracking, resource allocation, invoicing and reporting into one platform, providing live visibility into how projects are progressing and performing financially.
For project performance management, particularly useful features include:
Find out more about Project Flow’s features here
Pros
Cons
Best for: Growing and mid-sized architecture, engineering and consulting firms that have outgrown basic project management tools or spreadsheet-based processes and want greater control over project performance and profitability.
Project performance advantage: Milient Project Flow connects operational metrics such as project progress, hours and resource allocation with financial information such as fees, budgets and invoicing. This makes it easier to spot projects consuming too much time or budget and take action before margins are significantly affected.
Deltek Ajera combines project management and project-based accounting in a platform designed specifically for small architecture and engineering firms. By connecting project delivery with financial information, Ajera can help firms monitor project progress, understand financial performance and make more informed decisions throughout the project lifecycle.
For project performance management, particularly useful features include:
Pros
Cons
Best for: Small architecture and engineering firms that want project management and project accounting in the same system, with visibility into project delivery, time, billing and financial performance.
Project performance advantage: Ajera connects project management with accounting data, allowing A&E firms to evaluate project progress alongside financial performance. Dashboards, time and expense data, invoicing and financial information can help managers identify performance issues and make decisions based on both project delivery and commercial outcomes.
Scoro is an all-in-one work management platform that combines project management, resource planning, time tracking, budgeting, invoicing and reporting. For project performance management, its strength lies in connecting project delivery with financial data, helping professional services teams monitor how time, costs and resources affect project profitability.
For project performance management, particularly useful features include:
Pros
Cons
Best for: Professional services firms and agencies that want to connect project management, resource planning and financial performance within one comprehensive work management platform.
Project performance advantage: Scoro's quoted vs actual functionality is particularly relevant to project performance management. Teams can compare the original budget with hours and costs as they are consumed, helping identify overruns while there is still time to adjust delivery, resources or client expectations.
Improving project performance starts with having clear goals and enough visibility to identify problems before they affect deadlines, budgets or profitability. Rather than waiting until project completion, teams should continuously monitor performance and adjust plans when necessary.
One AEC consultancy uses Milient to improve visibility across project performance and commercial data. Bringing these insights together helps the firm better understand where margins may be under pressure, make more informed pricing decisions and use previous project performance to support future bids.
A growing architecture practice adopted Milient to replace disconnected spreadsheets and improve project visibility. Real-time timesheet, fee and capacity data now helps the team identify when projects are consuming budget too quickly, understand workloads and make more informed decisions about resourcing and future hiring.
A small architecture practice adopted Milient to gain clearer visibility into project time, fees and invoicing. By comparing timesheet data with project income, the team identified less profitable project types, improved fee discussions and made more informed decisions about which work to take on.
Effective project performance management comes down to having the right information at the right time. Milient Project Flow brings project progress, time, budgets, resources and financial data together, helping architecture, engineering and consulting firms identify issues earlier and make more informed decisions.
Ready to improve visibility across your projects?
Start a free trial of Milient Project Flow or book a demo to see how it could fit your workflows.
Want more content like this? Follow Milient: